Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 16:22:43 11/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2001 at 17:14:14, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On November 10, 2001 at 16:03:19, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On November 10, 2001 at 14:31:32, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On November 10, 2001 at 13:56:55, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>with all respect Jonas, >>> >>>but please look at the bloody nonsense lines the engines play. >>>How can you take that serious? Also Fritz doesn't seem to be >>>learning at all, nor does Junior. Did you turn off learning? >>> >>>Opening like 1.d4,d5 2.nf3,a6 >>> >>>How for **** sake can you present this as fritz-junior games? >>> >>> >>I ran the match in 3 parts and i might have forgotten to turn on book learn in >>one of those, but i am quite sure that i did not forget. > >Hello: > >How can you run a Match where you forget the learning capacity in one part of >the Match?? Easily :) >Interesting Matches (This is my opinion) are: 1) A Match with the Fritz Book >capacities learning enabled; 2) A Match with the Fritz Book capacities learning >unabled. Interesting too >If you run a Computer Match, you shouldn't change the initial conditions after >the Match has been started up. If i infact forgot to check the booklearning box in one part of the match, it was not intentionally, i always run these matches with booklearn. >>I use the default book for the engine tested against other opponents and for the >>opponents i use a book generated from 2600.pgn which means: shorter openeing >>lines and more exotic openings to avoid the same ol' openings we see all the >>time. > >A random opening book has the problem of many blunders and it cannot mean you >have more exotic openings. If you generate a book from a pgn file, Fritz will >save the statistics about the opening lines. Then, you can have the same main >openings of the standard book with more blunders. Junior 7 using the 2600.ctg (exotic book) won the match 14.5 - 9.5 >It would be interesting, if you can generate a book from a pgn file of a >specific opening line. For example: the mentioned Sicilian "Exotic" Line. >And see the result after 24 games. It would be really interesting to see 24 >games with a weird Sicilian line!!! :) Yes indeed :) >>This is not an attempt to run perfect games, with perfect lines that suit you >>Vincent, this is purely an experiment, take it or leave it. >>And with all respect Vincent, grow up!! > >I agree that this is not an attempt of the perfection but this cannot be >consider a "pure experiment", when you haven't controled the most important >variables of this Match to publish this result. Well shame on me :) >I understand perfectly what Vincent means and there's no matter of growing up >keeping like a child. It is his tone, not the actual content of his post i was reffering to, he is entitled to his own opinion. I did not run this match to offend anyone! Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.