Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz 7 v Junior 7 has ended (24 games pgn, long)

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 05:43:27 11/11/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 10, 2001 at 19:13:31, Jonas Cohonas wrote:

>On November 10, 2001 at 18:09:32, K. Burcham wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>so what is it with this "grow up" comment.
>
>That was a reply to his: "How for **** sake can you present this as fritz-junior
>games?" comment
>
>>here is my follow up to vincent's comment:
>>
>>one of the openings you used jonas was: 1.d4  d5  2.Nf3  a6  3.c4  e6
>
>I did not use them, the comp did.....

you clicked off tournament book from Kure first, the comp
by default has it turned on.

>>i checked this queens pawn opening in the tiger book ct.btk.
>>with the chess tiger 14 book, the move 2.Nf3 will not play.
>>now after changing books to gambit tiger 2.0, the program can play 2.Nf3.
>>but the program cannot play 2...a6.
>>
>>in my deep fritz, with the deepfritz.ctg book, deep fritz wants to play 2.c4.
>>
>>in my shredder5, under book options, book mode, if i select tournament book,
>>shredder5 will play 2.Nf3. but will not play 2...a6.
>>with the standard book in shredder5, it will play 2.Nf3 but not 2...a6.
>>with the wide book in shredder5, it will play 2.Nf3 but will not play 2...a6.
>>instead shredder5 wants 2...Nf6, or 2...e6, or 2...c6, if 2.Nf3 is played.
>
>I did say that i used a book compiled from 2600.pgn......

now a completely lunatic book you make look great by not letting it play
against a tournament book.

So the illusion you create is that nonsense openings can be played!

>>(vincents quote)
>>"with all respect Jonas,
>>but please look at the bloody nonsense lines the engines play.
>>How can you take that serious? Also Fritz doesn't seem to be
>>learning at all, nor does Junior. Did you turn off learning?
>>Opening like 1.d4,d5 2.nf3,a6
>>How for **** sake can you present this as fritz-junior games?"
>>
>>seems his comment is in order based on the books i checked.
>
>Again i used a book compiled from 2600.pgn...
>
>>and i agree with what vincent was saying. sure you can do what ever you want.
>>it is your software and your time. but the comp-comp tournaments we run can be
>>any of the following:  no book, gambit book only, common openings including
>>gambits, old theory book, modern up to date theory book, etc..
>>
>>it seems that we could have a tournament with all the top programs with any
>>combination of these books, such as a tournament with gambit only books.
>>
>>but for me, i want 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4
>>          or       1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nc3
>>          or        what is accepted as a safe opening so that we can have the
>>two programs decide with their programs which will win the game, without being
>>based on the books. but i know that in comp tournaments some of the guys have
>>their own secret books or books they think are an advantage over their
>>opponents. we can take one of the top programs and cripple it with a terrible
>>book, and i suspect it would lose more games than normal.
>
>Junior 7 using the 2600.ctg won the match 14.5 - 9.5.....

Wrong conclusion. Fritz without tournament book lost a match,
no big deal.

I knew in advance this would get your conclusion, because you can't
look at the facts objective.

>>it seems you could have learned from vincents comment.
>
>Yes if i shared his views...

Devil's advocate:

Your view is 2600 book is ok. First match it gets slaughtered of
course against default Kure + Fritz.

Second match you unclick learning and even had to turn off
tournament book, only then it starts to win. That fritz is carefully
tuned to just play a very narrow openings repertoire you prevent
then by having it play random book moves.

>Regards
>Jonas



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.