Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:12:12 11/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2001 at 10:44:01, K. Burcham wrote: > > >i understood what you originally said. >i was trying to get you to comment on how you look at the >accuracy of gm moves. i am not refering to short blitz games full of >blunders. i am refering to long standard tournament time gm games. >it is difficult to tell some times in this type of game, gm vs gm. >sometimes our programs seem to make the wrong move after long analysis. >gm also do this. i was just trying to get you to comment on this. > >kburcham I believe that computers are better than most GM's except the opening and minority of the positions. I believe that if you analyze human-human games then you are going to find more mistakes of humans then good moves of humans that computers cannot find. When you talk about the opening it is known that humans use computers to help them also to find novelties so it is natural that team of computer and human is going to be better than one of them. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.