Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 18:42:56 11/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2001 at 15:02:15, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 10, 2001 at 11:24:52, Frank Phillips wrote: > >>On November 10, 2001 at 10:17:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>> >>>You can do like the Nimzo guys did. Just set up 4 loops (for 4 piece >>>endings) and use each subscript to stick a piece on that square. Probe the >>>EGTB and if you get a score >0 store "mate", =0, store "draw" and <0 store >>>"mated". Only probe these beyond the first N plies of the search so that >>>you get real mate scores early, just win/lose/draw deep in the search. If >>>you do this for _all_ 4 piece files, you are going to end up with 40-50 megs >>>of stuff. To shrink this they didn't do all tables... >> >> >>Thanks: worth a try. 40-50MB RAM is certainly tolerable now. >> >>Frank > >Actually it may be bigger. 200mb is the size of the compressed tables. The The size of the "four" directory on your FTP site is only about 30MB. If you store only W/L/D instead of distance to mate, you must be able to save at least half that much space.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.