Author: José Carlos
Date: 04:02:49 11/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2001 at 05:14:30, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi Enrico, > >>As far as the next CCT, I can certainly begin to coordinate this as well, if >>necessary (if no one else is working on it...) If so, we need to get moving >>fast. We really should have one before end of November or first part of >>December. The last was in May I believe. > >well, I think so far no one else is working on it... :) Would be grate if you >can take that in your hands ! Maybe we should start another thread about that ? >Btw: My proposal: 2 weekends, 9 rounds swiss, I'd wait until knowing the number of players. Anyway, 8 rounds would be enough for any number of players, and would fit more logically in 4 days (2 games per day). >timecontrol 120 0 or 180 0 to discuss... I'd like to play that slow too. And I suppose Vincent will still say it's too fast :) I think 120 is ok, but I'd say 120 1. In case you fall into time trouble, you have always 1 second. Note that the 1 second added per move would only add 2 minutes in a long 120 moves game. >would be VERY tough weekends, considdering at least one day with 3 >games... :) maybe better 7 rounds... 3 days with 2 games and one with 1 game... I've never understood why it is preffered to play odd number of games. You can't play the same number of whites and blacks!! >Why so long time controls ? Well, last CCTs get faster and faster - I hope we >will start now the other way, to get back to something longer... Agreed. >(Why no >increment ? Easier to calculate when the rounds are finished and next one will >start...) > >Greets, Thomas 1 second increment will be equally easy to calculate. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.