Author: Olaf Jenkner
Date: 11:30:44 11/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
>A dual or quad intel box will _not_ be on this list. However, this list >has become pretty meaningless as it includes large "clusters" that are not >very easy to use to many calculations. In the old days, machines like Cray, >Hitachi, IBM and Fujitsu dominated this list. Now it is dominated by >clusters. That generally can't touch the supercomputers except for very >specific applications. Is it possible to use clusters for calculation of endgame tablebases? OJe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.