Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 16:08:20 11/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2001 at 14:57:42, Dann Corbit wrote: >On November 10, 2001 at 09:41:13, Frank Phillips wrote: > >>On November 10, 2001 at 07:34:09, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/c50/linux/ >>> >>>The installation looks kinda complicated though. If anyone >>>is successfull, please report here. >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>The install script did not work for me, so I pasted the following in .bashrc and >>anything else that needed it. (I do not know how to set the default paths for >>the window GUIs so have to compile etc in a console.). >> >>I got close to a 30 percent speedup (409 v 529) compared to gcc2.96 and >>gcc3.0.1. The Linux executable is now within a few percent of the Windows VC++ >>version. Very impressive. So much so, that I have not been using Windows since >>I got it - just in time for XP >> >>You can link statically if you want to produce an executable that does not need >>the Intel libraries. >> >>Hope the gcc guys talk nicely to Intel. > >Wait till you see version 6 (I have the Win32 version of the beta). >It's even better. This will really make Linux into a competitive platform. > >In fact, I would be keenly interested to see how Linux performs when the whole >kernel has been recompiled with the Intel compiler. It would crash i assume?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.