Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 16:29:28 11/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2001 at 18:59:49, Chessfun wrote: >Actually the page isn't the list he refers to it's at the start of this thread >where it states CB gui. I know. I checked the page instead of the original message, hence the reference. >Yace and Gandalf 432_h naturally have the penalty of >the CB engine adapter and in this case 1'/1" inc that penalty is even greater. Exactly. Have there been a lot of losses on time? Why isn't CM 8000 included? It should be less susceptible to the adapter thingy and would add to the diversity of the list. The four Fritz 6 mutations, as an example, skews the list. >Deep Shredder and Shredder 5 while they face the same adapter penalty, Deep >Shredder is only 8 points behind the native Shredder 5.32. Given the error bars the difference could be bigger. >All lists are fun arn't they?. Well... Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.