Author: Ian Aston
Date: 17:08:23 11/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2001 at 19:29:28, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 12, 2001 at 18:59:49, Chessfun wrote: > >>Actually the page isn't the list he refers to it's at the start of this thread >>where it states CB gui. > >I know. I checked the page instead of the original message, hence the reference. > >>Yace and Gandalf 432_h naturally have the penalty of >>the CB engine adapter and in this case 1'/1" inc that penalty is even greater. > >Exactly. Have there been a lot of losses on time? > >Why isn't CM 8000 included? It should be less susceptible to the adapter thingy >and would add to the diversity of the list. The four Fritz 6 mutations, as an >example, skews the list. > >>Deep Shredder and Shredder 5 while they face the same adapter penalty, Deep >>Shredder is only 8 points behind the native Shredder 5.32. > >Given the error bars the difference could be bigger. Conversely, given the error bars the difference could be smaller or even the opposite way round. > >>All lists are fun arn't they?. > >Well... > >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.