Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I think "f.ex. " means for example NT

Author: Eran

Date: 15:41:07 11/13/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 13, 2001 at 16:58:35, Chessfun wrote:

>On November 13, 2001 at 03:10:07, CLiebert wrote:
>
>>On November 13, 2001 at 02:29:56, Steffen Jakob wrote:
>>
>>>On November 13, 2001 at 02:17:37, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>
>>>>I quess the difference to Deep Fritz (in computer play) is so small or
>>>>non-existent, that we will never get enough games to get statistical proof
>>>>if it's better than previous Fritz!?
>>>
>>>I dont have DF and I dont have F7 but I wonder why people always think about
>>>"strength" and not about "style"? Because strength seems to be measurable?
>>>
>>>>Also I wonder why some persons are testing no-MMX version even if they have MMX
>>>>capable prosessor - total waste of time...
>>>
>>>Best wishes,
>>>Steffen.
>>
>>
>>Watch these evaluations f.ex. ...
>
>f.ex. ...Is this another mystery? or the same one?.
>
>Sarah.
>
>>Christian
>>
>>
>>Fritz 7 - Chess Tiger 14.0 [B01]
>>Fr7-10m5s-864 Nm-C HH, 2001
>>
>>1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Dxd5 3.Sc3 Da5 4.d4 Sf6 5.Sf3 c6 6.Lc4 Lf5 7.Ld2  0.25/10  12



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.