Author: pavel
Date: 19:51:12 11/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 13, 2001 at 22:45:34, Dann Corbit wrote: >On November 13, 2001 at 22:40:34, pavel wrote: > >>>I rather suspect that nothing is going to compete with ChessMaster here. Even >>>dedicated mate solvers will have a time beating that speed. TheKing engine >>>seems to have an incredible knack to exploit the opponent when they are over the >>>barrel. >> >> >>both little goliath and junior 6 finds it faster see my post. >>It was on pentium III 1gz > >Less than 46 seconds for a mate in 10 [that's what I got on my machine]? > >It looked to me like neither beat it -- not even close. >Goliath Light saw a mate in 13 after 3 minutes, still. >Junior only 24 seconds, but a mate in 13. On my machine, ChessMaster 8000 took >all of 12 seconds to find a mate in 13. >Shredder found a mate in 10 in 52 seconds (and I suspect that the hardware was >faster than my 950 MHz Athlon) > >So ChessMaster looks like a clear champion to me. I am kinda confused if its mate in 13 than whats with the mate in 10 then?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.