Author: blass uri
Date: 22:56:40 06/01/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 1998 at 00:56:55, Rafael Vasquez wrote: >Here are the games. Some have been posted before. Note that the last >game was a >draw only because I improved the opening line in the CSTAL book. If not, >you would be counting it as another win for Fritz5, because CSTAL seeks >a crazy sacrifice in it. CSTAL was running on a K6233 with 32 mega RAM >(faster than >Thorsten machines) and Fritz5 was on a portable Texas Instruments >Extensa 900 >Pentium 133 Mhz with 32 mega RAM. You can consider it a victory for >Fritz5, which hold on a slower machine. I intended to switch machines ( >CSTal on P133 and Fritz5 on K6233) but later I didn't want to assist to >the slaughter. what it the ratio between the speed of the machines for every program (it can be different because I read fritz5 love the pentium) what is the ratio between your machine and Thorsten machine? it was claimed that cstal earn more from the time factor did you try to do matches with slower rate to see if it is truth. I want to know because I use the computer for hours when I sleep and if I believe CStal can win fritz5 in slower rate than maybe I buy Cstal. my only experiment about the nunn match between fritz5 and Junior4.6 showed that fritz5 earn from time Junior4.6 lost 6:2 in the first 8 games(1000 seconds per move) I have no autoplayer and I did the match on the same computer Mark young's match also proved that fritz5 is good at slow rate but if there is a program that is better than fritz5 (maybe only at slow rate) I want to know (not from Thorsten because his results are different than other results) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.