Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 23:14:14 06/01/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 1998 at 19:20:34, Mark Taylor wrote: >My 15 year old piece values might be playing tricks on my memory - its >possible that the bishop value should have been 3.25. Also the values >were rules of thumb for human v human at lower club level. > >Piece values can be debated endlessly anyway - I don't believe that the >chess pieces have static values anyway - they depend on the position. >Any position evaluation using static values is (IMHO) going to be >inaccurate for a significant number of positions. yes but you have to have some guide or else you will routinely trade a rook for Bishop and pawn and then lose. -- Komputer Korner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.