Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:23:50 11/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 2001 at 16:55:26, David Hanley wrote: >I got it myself in about two minutes. > >It's pretty straightforward for a human, because of white's requirement to check >every move. So I it's an good problem for a selective search, i suppose. > >dave It is not easy for humans to imagine the picture after some checks so I do not think that it is straightforward for humans. There is also more than one possibility to play checks for white and if you are not lucky to start with the right line you may have problems. I did not try to solve it with no computer but it is clear for me that I am going to need to play moves in a real board and it is going to take me more than 2 minutes to see the mate. Uri
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.