Author: Chessfun
Date: 15:34:30 11/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2001 at 05:19:07, CLiebert wrote: >On November 13, 2001 at 16:57:09, Chessfun wrote: > >>On November 13, 2001 at 03:14:41, CLiebert wrote: >> >>>On November 13, 2001 at 02:17:37, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>I quess the difference to Deep Fritz (in computer play) is so small or >>>>non-existent, that we will never get enough games to get statistical proof >>>>if it's better than previous Fritz!? >>> >>>May be it won´t be important anymore very soon... >>> >>>Christian >> >>What does that mean? or is it meant to be a mystery? >>If so, why even bother posting? >> >>Sarah. > >It means that nobody will care about the first engine when the second is out. >And the second is stronger than the first and than nommx be ashured. But it is >not my job to make announcements ;-) ... > >Christian Maybe it isn't your job. But since you are a Chessbase beta tester you could have written the above the first time instead of the riddle you wrote. Or written nothing of course. Sarah. >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>>>Also I wonder why some persons are testing no-MMX version even if they have MMX >>>>capable prosessor - total waste of time... >>>> >>>>Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.