Author: CLiebert
Date: 08:19:12 11/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 2001 at 18:34:30, Chessfun wrote: >On November 14, 2001 at 05:19:07, CLiebert wrote: > >>On November 13, 2001 at 16:57:09, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On November 13, 2001 at 03:14:41, CLiebert wrote: >>> >>>>On November 13, 2001 at 02:17:37, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>I quess the difference to Deep Fritz (in computer play) is so small or >>>>>non-existent, that we will never get enough games to get statistical proof >>>>>if it's better than previous Fritz!? >>>> >>>>May be it won´t be important anymore very soon... >>>> >>>>Christian >>> >>>What does that mean? or is it meant to be a mystery? >>>If so, why even bother posting? >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>It means that nobody will care about the first engine when the second is out. >>And the second is stronger than the first and than nommx be ashured. But it is >>not my job to make announcements ;-) ... >> >>Christian > >Maybe it isn't your job. Not "maybe", it isn´t my job. I should know it! >But since you are a Chessbase beta tester Thats wrong, I am a tester. you could have written the above the first time instead of the riddle you wrote. Or written nothing of course. Thanks for your advice. Christian > >Sarah. > > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Also I wonder why some persons are testing no-MMX version even if they have MMX >>>>>capable prosessor - total waste of time... >>>>> >>>>>Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.