Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 21:07:36 11/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2001 at 18:46:35, Brian Richardson wrote: >I am somewhat frustrated. I made some changes to Tinker adding lazy eval and >some other terms and then tested several things. > >It improved nps speed by about 30%. > >It improved WAC results. > >It won or drew every self play game (blitz and standard). > >Then I put the new version up to play at ICC. >It promptly lost 100 points in blitz and standard !? > >This is not the first time that my "enhancements" seemed to improve things but >turned out to play worse in actual games. > >Does this sort of thing happen to others too? > >Thanks >Brian Lazy eval is dangerous, if not done well you can lose a lot of positional strength. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.