Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:32:20 11/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2001 at 04:14:39, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On November 16, 2001 at 19:59:10, Joshua Lee wrote: > >>The match will wake a lot of people up look at Junior's game against Kramnik has >>anyone attempted to see exactly how long it takes Junior to make moves that >>would've kept it from loosing? >> >>I really think that even on a 320Ghz machine any chess program will still be >>able to be beaten but the correct positions have to be found from games that >>test positional play. > >And how can you explain why Deep Blue is still the stronger chess machine in the >world: Do you think that it depends from its positional knowledge or from its >pure brute force power of calculation ... > >Regards I do not think that deep blue is the strongest chess machine in the world. I believe that Fritz on the hardware that is going to be used against kramnik is better. I also believe that kramnik is going to win but the conditions for Fritz are not the same as the conditions for kasparov. I also think that learning from the time that programs need to avoid the mistakes of Deep Junior against kramnik is wrong for some reasons: 1)Junior could play different moves on faster hardware earlier in the game so even if it repeats the same mistake it does not mean that kramnik could win against it. 2)Junior6 is old and today there are better programs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.