Author: Chessfun
Date: 03:43:13 11/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2001 at 11:19:12, CLiebert wrote: >On November 15, 2001 at 18:34:30, Chessfun wrote: > >>On November 14, 2001 at 05:19:07, CLiebert wrote: >> >>>On November 13, 2001 at 16:57:09, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On November 13, 2001 at 03:14:41, CLiebert wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 13, 2001 at 02:17:37, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I quess the difference to Deep Fritz (in computer play) is so small or >>>>>>non-existent, that we will never get enough games to get statistical proof >>>>>>if it's better than previous Fritz!? >>>>> >>>>>May be it won´t be important anymore very soon... >>>>> >>>>>Christian >>>> >>>>What does that mean? or is it meant to be a mystery? >>>>If so, why even bother posting? >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>>It means that nobody will care about the first engine when the second is out. >>>And the second is stronger than the first and than nommx be ashured. But it is >>>not my job to make announcements ;-) ... >>> >>>Christian >> >>Maybe it isn't your job. > >Not "maybe", it isn´t my job. I should know it! > > >>But since you are a Chessbase beta tester > >Thats wrong, I am a tester. So you don't test for Chessbase? >>you could have written the above the first time instead of the riddle you wrote. >>Or written nothing of course. > >Thanks for your advice. You're very welcome !! Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.