Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 05:03:10 11/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2001 at 05:32:20, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 17, 2001 at 04:14:39, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On November 16, 2001 at 19:59:10, Joshua Lee wrote: >> >>>The match will wake a lot of people up look at Junior's game against Kramnik has >>>anyone attempted to see exactly how long it takes Junior to make moves that >>>would've kept it from loosing? >>> >>>I really think that even on a 320Ghz machine any chess program will still be >>>able to be beaten but the correct positions have to be found from games that >>>test positional play. >> >>And how can you explain why Deep Blue is still the stronger chess machine in the >>world: Do you think that it depends from its positional knowledge or from its >>pure brute force power of calculation ... >> >>Regards > >I do not think that deep blue is the strongest chess machine in the world. >I believe that Fritz on the hardware that is going to be used against kramnik is >better. Uri, I know that Fritz has better software algorithms than D.B. , but Deep Blue has on its favour the power of an IBM SP/2 server equipped with a large number of special-purpose chips. By using over 200 of these chips the overall speed of the program could be raised to 200 million positions per second. > >I also believe that kramnik is going to win but the conditions for Fritz are not >the same as the conditions for kasparov. Do you mean the fact that V.K. was allowed to prepare against the Fritz program and discover perhaps some weak points in it ? Regards, Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.