Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 11:16:59 11/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2001 at 12:32:03, Christophe Theron wrote: >On November 17, 2001 at 10:17:18, Terje Vagle wrote: > >>On November 17, 2001 at 09:43:37, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On November 17, 2001 at 09:27:49, Dr. Franklin wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> nt >>> >>> >>>Very soon by now, yesterday I stopped my tries to get Century 4 to work >>>properly under XP. So the master cdrom goes in the mail to the duplication >>>factory monday morning. From there it usually takes 7-8 working days. >>> >>>Ed >> Actualy there already is long time tossing between programmers and Microsoft To be precise from the very first version Hard ware drivers who is responsable Microsoft or the hardware manafactuur By my believings it is Microsofts responsebilety If you generate an OS wich does not instal all avalible hardware on the market You play dirty tricks because you give false concurency on th hardware market If Microsoft creates an OS with no hardware suport nobody buys it. If Windows xp stands for freedom it should be able to run dos aplications Because it is a restriction when it doesn't And it actualy is not only Unix but also DOS wich where much more stable the any version of windows. The only reason windows came on the market was because it was posible to run more tahn 1 program at once. Mostlikely it is posible to run more then 1 program under good old DOS with today technolegy too And 1 question to ed Is it not likely if you change the io.sys that you can rule the memory manager I also have this for Windows ME i just can start it from DOS >>Or is this memory manager in the registry >>So, from this we know that it wont work under XP. Marc van Hal >> >>Well, Fritz 7 will..... >> >>Terje Vagle > > > >That's not what I understand when I read Ed's message. > > > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.