Author: Dr. Franklin
Date: 15:40:52 11/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2001 at 15:59:39, Ed Schröder wrote: >On November 17, 2001 at 14:17:14, J.Dufek wrote: > >>Sorry Ed, but when you firstly sent information about 100% last DOS Rebel >>version? If i have good memory, first "last" version DOS version was Rebel 10, >>this was 3 years ago. After 3 years your work here isn't Win32 version. >>Rebel works good under W2k, but people want use "multitasking" and cann't >>support old technology. 100.000 years ago humans lived on tree and now...? DOS >>is really 5 yaers dead and now ....? ....here is "new" applications for this >>OS...? Why? This is strategy your company? Do you make DOS programs only because >>every end of year you release new vesrion? >>Only my opinion. >>J. > > >Your opinion and criticism is all understood and well taken. But realize >Century 4 is still an option for many people despite being DOS. If there >was no interest why should I even bother. > >Its reason for not being a true Win32 application yet has been posted by >me many times. I very well realize a Windows interface for many people is >mandatory, yet realize there are people who don't care and emphesize on >the quality of the chess engine instead. For those is Century 4. > >Ed I agree with you 100% Ed, Personally I can care less if Rebel is a Windows program, My main interest is in the Strength of the Engine. Actually I think the Dos interface of the present rebel is quite nice.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.