Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 15:58:57 11/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2001 at 18:24:20, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On November 17, 2001 at 16:02:49, Joshua Lee wrote: > >>Even without the massive hardware and despite how much slower it would be is >>there enough knowledge about how Deep thought/ Blue Played to re-create it? >>How much time and money would it take? > >Hi Joshua, >I think that as already stated somewhere in this forum , the D.B. algorithms , >evals and so on are pretty standard ones and to be more clear are a bit outdated >since that project was stopped on '97 by the IBM. >The great "plus" of D.B. was and still is the hardware base of calculus with >specialized chips capable to reach an outstanding value of 200 >Megapositions/second . > >Kind regards, >Otello. Hi Otello, the eval of DB is standard and even outdated? how you know certainly this? I think it was also stated somewhere in this forum that db eval was very complex and knowing a lot of a lot, just not enough tested. They even had a gm there, and a lot of speed, so why the eval could have been simple? I don't think so.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.