Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 14:34:11 11/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2001 at 15:58:11, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>Hi Thorsten
>
>It was only one tournament with 9 games for each program. And you know by
>experience that in such a tournament, everything can happen. One or two losses
>of a given program can lead to a complete other cross table.
>Kind regards
>Kurt
i don't accept these answers. i don't believe in those statistic-religion you
all believe into.
when nimzo and rebel play different than in my tournament, there must be an
explanation.
in my tournament nimzo and rebel are here:
<pre>
Tournament: Odyssee-Tournament
Place Name Sco MBch Buch Ws
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 SHREDDER5, (1) 7.5 34 43½ 6
2 GAMBIT-TIGER14.6, (2) 6.5 32 43 5
3-4 NIMZO8, (20) 6.0 34½ 46 5
PHARAON 2.5, (12) 6.0 33 40½ 4
5-6 REBEL-CENTURY4, (10) 5.5 36 47½ 4
YACE BERLIN, (24) 5.5 32½ 41½ 4
7-10 JUNIOR7, (9) 5.0 37 46 3
CHESSMASTER8000 1.0.4., (6) 5.0 32 41 4
GANDALF432H, (11) 5.0 29 36½ 4
SHREDDER4 CHESSBITS, (5) 5.0 28½ 37 2
11-15 DEEP FRITZ, (8) 4.5 37½ 49 2
MCHESS8, (23) 4.5 34½ 45 3
ZARKOV4.5T, (13) 4.5 31½ 39 3
GROMIT 3.8.1, (26) 4.5 31 41 2
REBEL-TIGER14.6, (3) 4.5 29½ 35½ 2
16-22 PATZER311B, (17) 4.0 37½ 49 2
CRAFTY 18.12, (19) 4.0 35½ 43 3
HIARCS7.01, (4) 4.0 29 35½ 2
CHESS SYSTEM TAL2.03, (14) 4.0 28½ 39 1
GENIUS6.5 CZUB-STYLE, (21) 4.0 28½ 36½ 2
LITTLE-GOLIATH2000V3, (16) 4.0 28 35 2
VIRTUAL-CHESS2, (7) 4.0 26 33½ 3
23 WCHESS2000, (15) 3.5 31½ 41 1
24 COMET B36, (18) 3.0 28½ 37½ 2
25-26 EUGEN7.92, (25) 1.5 28½ 36 0
SOCRATES X, (22) 1.5 28½ 35 1
</pre>
from the first impression i had with nimzo, i was sure that it is strong.
you must be blind not to see this.
why is nimzo failing in strength somewhere else ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.