Author: Jesper Antonsson
Date: 14:58:07 11/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2001 at 16:38:12, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >On November 18, 2001 at 12:48:37, Jesper Antonsson wrote: > >>On November 18, 2001 at 11:03:39, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >> >>>On November 18, 2001 at 04:42:33, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>>>The real gain would be to marry the hardware of D.B. to the software algoritms >>>>of Fritz7 or Chess Tiger IMHO. >>> >>>Yep, that programs with 200 MNPS should be much more stronger than Deep Blue... >> >>Again, that seems like speculation to me. > >Yes it is. > >I think I would win a bet here anyway :) Well, I doubt it, partly because such a Fritz wouldn't be tuned for the speed, partly because I doubt that their eval is better. But, if you wait 10 years or so (hopefully), when you can run at 200 Mnps on a serial machine, and then run new software on that machine, I think *that* machine would be much stronger than DB, for several reasons. :-)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.