Author: Harald Faber
Date: 22:09:40 11/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2001 at 17:45:36, Thorsten Czub wrote: >it is playing very good. not that it played good in round 9, in the >moment i sit here it plays very good game versus gambit tiger, which is, >a strong program too. IF - > >IF nimzo would be that weak as you all call it, it could not have such >a high ranking in my tournament and also not play those good games. > >i am going to become angry. not about you harald. but about those >stupid guys repeating and repeating over and over again that nimzo is weak. >nimzo8 is strong. other versions before were weak. weaker. but this version is >strong. > >how can those fool repeat and repeat always the same stuff. i don't get this. It is easy: 1) Wow, you have played 9 games, amazing. 2) Have you ever seen Nimzo play endgames? Have you ever seen Nimzo WINNING at least ONE endgame? I haven't. It is the worst endgame player I know between the commercials. Then comes Junior 7... 3) Have you (like I have) seen Nimzo pondering absolutely bullshit? Expecting a totally lost move by the opponent which f course did not happen on the board? Nimzo might be strong enough for us patzers, but is clearly behind the top programs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.