Author: José Carlos
Date: 11:26:22 11/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2001 at 12:53:20, Antonio Dieguez wrote:
>On November 19, 2001 at 10:00:00, José Carlos wrote:
>
>>On November 18, 2001 at 18:11:04, Antonio Dieguez wrote:
>>
>>>On November 18, 2001 at 17:58:07, Jesper Antonsson wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 18, 2001 at 16:38:12, Antonio Dieguez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 18, 2001 at 12:48:37, Jesper Antonsson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On November 18, 2001 at 11:03:39, Antonio Dieguez wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On November 18, 2001 at 04:42:33, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>>>>>>>The real gain would be to marry the hardware of D.B. to the software algoritms
>>>>>>>>of Fritz7 or Chess Tiger IMHO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yep, that programs with 200 MNPS should be much more stronger than Deep Blue...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Again, that seems like speculation to me.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes it is.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think I would win a bet here anyway :)
>>>>
>>>>Well, I doubt it, partly because such a Fritz wouldn't be tuned for the speed,
>>>>partly because I doubt that their eval is better. But, if you wait 10 years or
>>>>so (hopefully), when you can run at 200 Mnps on a serial machine, and then run
>>>>new software on that machine, I think *that* machine would be much stronger than
>>>>DB, for several reasons. :-)
>>>
>>>Deep Blue was tuned for its speed, so that is an advantadge for it, but even
>>>that way, I hope programs of today can still run on that machine and that
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[snip]
>(of course I don't expect Fritz running on DB, who said that?)
I understood you meant "Fritz running in DB hardware". If I'm wrong, sorry for
the misunderstanding.
José C.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.