Author: Jesper Antonsson
Date: 14:18:22 11/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2001 at 14:48:06, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >On November 19, 2001 at 14:26:22, José Carlos wrote: > >... >>>>>>Well, I doubt it, partly because such a Fritz wouldn't be tuned for the speed, >>>>>>partly because I doubt that their eval is better. But, if you wait 10 years or >>>>>>so (hopefully), when you can run at 200 Mnps on a serial machine, and then run >>>>>>new software on that machine, I think *that* machine would be much stronger than >>>>>>DB, for several reasons. :-) >>>>> >>>>>Deep Blue was tuned for its speed, so that is an advantadge for it, but even >>>>>that way, I hope programs of today can still run on that machine and that >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >>[snip] >> >>>(of course I don't expect Fritz running on DB, who said that?) >> >> I understood you meant "Fritz running in DB hardware". If I'm wrong, sorry for >>the misunderstanding. > >I meant the machine of wich Antonsson was speaking... altough I don't know what >serial means. Serial means "not parallel" in this context. >Be well.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.