Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:08:04 11/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2001 at 20:14:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On November 19, 2001 at 18:36:45, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 19, 2001 at 17:49:48, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On November 19, 2001 at 14:43:38, Ernst Walet wrote: >>> >>>>This is a nice king safety position from the Rebel site showing (likely) Fritz7 >>>>indeed has more king safety knowledge. >>>>Futhermore Fritz7 (noMMX) seems to be the latest development of fritz6, as >>>>surgested by many indeed. >>> >>>well let's delay opinion upon default fritz7 for some time, but fritz7nommx >>>looks like a positional dumber version. its minimum improvement is 0.03 >>>of a pawn. So pawn=32 or frans searches with [alfa+3,max(alfa+4,beta)] >>>Anyway something that makes it positional more silly. >> >>Ir is not clear that doing it make the program weaker positionally. > >well if all you think you need is a beancounter, >then you're kind of wrong. I did not say it. Not caring about difference of less than 0.03 pawns does not mean being a bean counter and the program can still have significant positional scores. I consider difference of 0.04 pawns as a positional difference and even 0.4 pawn is a positional difference. I do not have Fritz7 but the only way to know if the program is better or worse than Fritz6 is by testing. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.