Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 17:40:02 11/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2001 at 20:14:05, Ren Wu wrote: >On November 20, 2001 at 20:05:01, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On November 20, 2001 at 19:45:26, Ren Wu wrote: >> >>>I wonder how other programs are doing on this suite at differet time control, >>>like 5s, 20s, and 60s? >> >>Do we have a difinitive copy of the latest and greatest version which we feel >>confident is fairly well debugged? > >I download GCP's 'final' version a while back from here, so I guess gcp is >pretty sure it is correct. GCP, can you confirm? Who? me? :) I don't know what exactly you have there, but if I branded it final it should be ok. I remember there being some comments on that too, but the only one I find warranted in retrospect is a position (this is from memory) where Bb7 mates in 7 or so while Rg2+ mates in 12. I originally said that I considered the shortest mate to be the 'correct' move, but I have since reconsidered. If you remove this, you should have exactly 180 left. Sjeng solves 79 at 5 seconds per move on an Athlon 1000. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.