Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 22:01:21 11/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2001 at 20:40:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 20, 2001 at 20:14:05, Ren Wu wrote: > >>On November 20, 2001 at 20:05:01, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On November 20, 2001 at 19:45:26, Ren Wu wrote: >>> >>>>I wonder how other programs are doing on this suite at differet time control, >>>>like 5s, 20s, and 60s? >>> >>>Do we have a difinitive copy of the latest and greatest version which we feel >>>confident is fairly well debugged? >> >>I download GCP's 'final' version a while back from here, so I guess gcp is >>pretty sure it is correct. GCP, can you confirm? > >Who? me? :) > >I don't know what exactly you have there, but if I branded it final >it should be ok. > >I remember there being some comments on that too, but the only one >I find warranted in retrospect is a position (this is from memory) >where Bb7 mates in 7 or so while Rg2+ mates in 12. > >I originally said that I considered the shortest mate to be the >'correct' move, but I have since reconsidered. > >If you remove this, you should have exactly 180 left. > >Sjeng solves 79 at 5 seconds per move on an Athlon 1000. > >-- >GCP I have something you posted a while back with 183 positions... For reference, my quad 700 gets 100 right in 5 secs...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.