Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:44:24 11/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2001 at 01:46:28, Slater Wold wrote: >On November 20, 2001 at 23:13:02, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 20, 2001 at 22:10:09, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>1 CPU: >>> >>>Deep Fritz - W,S >>>r2qrb1k/1p1b2p1/p2ppn1p/8/3NP3/1BN5/PPP3QP/1K3RR1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Deep Fritz: >>> >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 >>> = (0.06) Depth: 3/11 00:00:00 >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 >>> = (0.06) Depth: 3/11 00:00:00 >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 >>> = (0.06) Depth: 3/11 00:00:00 >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 >>> = (0.06) Depth: 3/11 00:00:00 >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 Qc7 >>> = (-0.06) Depth: 4/15 00:00:00 1kN >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 Qc7 >>> = (-0.06) Depth: 4/15 00:00:00 1kN >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 Qc7 >>> = (-0.06) Depth: 4/15 00:00:00 1kN >>>1.Nde2! >>> = (-0.03) Depth: 4/15 00:00:00 4kN >>>1.Nde2 Rc8 2.Nf4 g5 3.Ng6+ Kh7 >>> = (0.03) Depth: 5/17 00:00:00 8kN >>>1.Nce2! >>> = (0.06) Depth: 5/18 00:00:00 16kN >>>1.Nce2 g5 2.h4 g4 3.Nf4 Qc8 >>> = (0.16) Depth: 6/20 00:00:00 34kN >>>1.Nce2 e5 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Rxf5 Rc8 4.Nc3 Qc7 >>> = (0.09) Depth: 7/25 00:00:00 102kN >>>1.Nce2 e5 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Rxf5 Rc8 4.Nc3 Qc7 5.Bd5 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 8/26 00:00:00 314kN >>>1.Nce2 e5 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Rxf5 Rc8 4.Bd5 Qc7 5.Nc3 b5 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 9/24 00:00:00 668kN >>>1.Nf3! >>> ² (0.41) Depth: 9/29 00:00:01 1487kN >>>1.Nf3! Qa5 2.Nh4 Qg5 3.Qxg5 hxg5 4.Ng6+ Kh7 5.Rxg5 Be7 >>> ² (0.44) Depth: 9/29 00:00:02 2617kN >>>1.Nf3 Qa5 2.Nh4 Qg5 3.Qxg5 hxg5 4.Ng6+ Kh7 5.Rxg5 Kh6 6.h4 Be7 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 10/28 00:00:04 4195kN >>>1.Nce2! >>> ² (0.41) Depth: 10/28 00:00:04 4662kN >>>1.Nce2! >>> ± (0.72) Depth: 11/30 00:00:08 8592kN >>>1.Nce2 e5 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Rxf5 Qe7 4.Rgf1 d5 5.Bxd5 Nxd5 6.exd5 Qd6 >>> ² (0.66) Depth: 12/35 00:00:16 17113kN >>>1.Nf3! >>> ² (0.69) Depth: 12/35 00:00:25 27163kN >>>1.Nf3! Bc6 2.Nh4 g5 3.Ng6+ Kg7 4.Nxf8 Rxf8 5.h4 Kf7 6.hxg5 hxg5 >>> ± (0.97) Depth: 12/35 00:00:43 45849kN >>>1.Nf3 Qa5 2.Nh4 Qg5 3.Ng6+ Kh7 4.Qf3 Qa5 5.Nxf8+ Rxf8 6.Qg3 Nh5 >>> ± (0.97) Depth: 13/35 00:01:18 83931kN >>> >>>(W, 20.11.2001) >>> >>>2 CPU's: >>> >>>Deep Fritz - W,S >>>r2qrb1k/1p1b2p1/p2ppn1p/8/3NP3/1BN5/PPP3QP/1K3RR1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Deep Fritz: >>> >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 >>> = (0.06) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 >>> = (0.06) Depth: 3/11 00:00:00 >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 >>> = (0.06) Depth: 3/11 00:00:00 >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 >>> = (0.06) Depth: 3/11 00:00:00 >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 >>> = (0.06) Depth: 3/11 00:00:00 >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 Qc7 >>> = (-0.06) Depth: 4/15 00:00:00 1kN >>>1.Qg6 Rc8 2.h4 Qc7 >>> = (-0.06) Depth: 4/15 00:00:00 1kN >>>1.Nde2! >>> = (-0.03) Depth: 4/15 00:00:00 4kN >>>1.Nde2 Rc8 2.Nf4 g5 3.Ng6+ Kh7 >>> = (0.03) Depth: 5/14 00:00:00 8kN >>>1.Nce2! >>> = (0.06) Depth: 5/18 00:00:00 17kN >>>1.Nce2 g5 2.h4 g4 3.Nf4 Qc8 >>> = (0.16) Depth: 6/20 00:00:00 34kN >>>1.Nce2 e5 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Rxf5 Rc8 4.Nc3 Qc7 >>> = (0.09) Depth: 7/25 00:00:00 103kN >>>1.Nce2 e5 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Rxf5 Rc8 4.Nc3 Qc7 5.Bd5 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 8/25 00:00:00 317kN >>>1.Nce2 e5 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Rxf5 Rc8 4.Bd5 Qc7 5.Nc3 b5 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 9/24 00:00:00 661kN >>>1.Nf3! >>> ² (0.41) Depth: 9/27 00:00:01 1599kN >>>1.Nf3! Qa5 2.Nh4 Qg5 3.Qxg5 hxg5 4.Ng6+ Kh7 >>> ² (0.44) Depth: 9/27 00:00:02 3413kN >>>1.Nf3 Qa5 2.Nh4 Qg5 3.Qxg5 hxg5 4.Ng6+ Kh7 5.Nxf8+ Rxf8 6.Rd1 Ne8 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 10/30 00:00:03 4601kN >>>1.Nce2! >>> ² (0.41) Depth: 10/30 00:00:04 5076kN >>>1.Nce2! >>> ± (0.72) Depth: 11/29 00:00:06 8587kN >>>1.Nce2 e5 2.Nf5 Bxf5 3.Rxf5 Qe7 4.Rgf1 d5 5.Bxd5 Nxd5 6.exd5 Qd6 >>> ² (0.66) Depth: 12/31 00:00:12 16798kN >>>1.Nf3! >>> ² (0.69) Depth: 12/32 00:00:20 26626kN >>>1.Nf3! Bc6 2.Nh4 g5 3.Ng6+ Kg7 4.Nxf8 Rxf8 5.h4 Kf7 6.hxg5 hxg5 >>> ± (0.97) Depth: 12/33 00:00:33 45510kN >>>1.Nf3 Qa5 2.Nh4 Qg5 3.Ng6+ Kh7 4.Qf3 Qa5 5.Nxf8+ Rxf8 6.Qg3 Nh5 >>> ± (1.00) Depth: 13/35 00:00:59 81622kN >>> >>>(W, 20.11.2001) >>> >>> >>>What's the speedup on that? >> >>25/20=1.25 >> >>Deep Fritz one processor needed 25 seconds to find Nf3 when Deep Fritz one >>processor needed 20 seconds to find Nf3. >> >>The speed up seems to be slightly better at longer time control(Deep Fritz >>needed 59 seconds to get a score at depth 13 with 2 proccesors against 78 >>seconds with one processor and almost the same pv >> >>78/59>1.25 >> >>Uri > >So to answer some people's questions out there, yes, Chessbase lied. > >I have had 3 SMP systems, and all have run DF. None of them have _EVER_ gotten >an 80% speedup. > >The 2xP31.0Ghz got the best speedup; 1.4 on most positions. > >The 2xXP1.53Ghz gets the worst speedup; 1.25 (1.3 in my longer tests) on most >positions. > >I don't know many people who use DF, but the ones I have talked to, get lousy >results too. You may be right but one position is not enough. I use Deep Fritz but I do not use more than one processor and the reason for me to buy Deep Fritz was simply the fact that it is better on one processor. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.