Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 01:33:10 11/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2001 at 21:09:37, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 20, 2001 at 21:02:45, James Swafford wrote: > >>So you're arguing my original point. After some consideration >>I think either approach is fine. > >I think it's silly not to limit if the limit doesn't cost >anything and may save you ass someday or in some freak >positions. I think it's silly to limit if the absence of a limit doesn't cost anything and may save you ass someday or in some freak positions. If one has a SEE maybe one can use the value of this function at some stage of course to limit the qsearch. Ralf > >>Or are you proposing something else? Perhaps a different depth or >>something dynamic? > >I use max quiescent depth = nominal search depth * 2 > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.