Author: Marcus Kaestner
Date: 14:37:38 11/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
>The only sensible thing you can read from the list is the strength of the >Tigers, which isn't a novelty. The collection of strange settings, different >hardware and timecontrol makes the list worthless. Unless you want a good laugh >and who doesn't? So yet another fun rating list. there is no need that you like the list. but there is also no need to disqualify the list as a joke. 1.there are no strange settings included. most of the special settings are very good and useful. and no other list shows that. 2.the different time controls are the goal of the list. so you can see which program is the best "overall" and not under special laboratory conditions which no one has at home. 3.there are also separated lists for blitz,rapid and tournament chess. and: if you laugh or not, all the lists have different leaders. but overall tiger is the best (on single). so ignore the list if you dislike it, but stay away from showing disrespect. it´s not fair to the people which are spending so much time. not very gentle, your comment. marcus
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.