Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: new chessbits rating list

Author: Ian Aston

Date: 16:02:50 11/21/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 21, 2001 at 18:03:21, Mike S. wrote:

>On November 21, 2001 at 16:29:56, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>
>>On November 21, 2001 at 16:01:12, Roy Eassa wrote:
>>
>>>On November 21, 2001 at 10:20:06, Marcus Kaestner wrote:
>>>>http://mitglied.tripod.de/ChessBits/index.html
>>>
>>>According to this list, these are the strongest 10 single-CPU programs:
>>>
>>>1 Gambit Tiger 2 agg.  2735
>>>2 Tiger 14             2726
>>>3 Gambit Tiger 2       2715
>>>(...)
>
>>The only sensible thing you can read from the list is the strength of the
>>Tigers, which isn't a novelty. The collection of strange settings, different
>>hardware and timecontrol makes the list worthless. Unless you want a good laugh
>>and who doesn't? So yet another fun rating list.
>
>I don't think the list is worthless. IIRC, the hardware used isn't extremely
>different but in a reasonable bandwidth. And when programs and engines offer
>adjustable settings for people who like to experiment and to tune, why not
>include them in a rating list? I understand the critizism for combining results
>from different time controls, which is unusal to do... I assume that's just
>their way of offering a single complete list to the public. An "overall" list so
>to speak.
>
>There are some programs listed I don't know what they are exactly (i.e. Explorer
>or Challenger, I think these are Shredder 5 settings), but here I assume
>ChessBits readers will know more about those.
>
>Expecially interesting is that y13 engine, which seems to be a result of using
>that Che++ Nimzo language. This is something which was introduced with Nimzo 3.
>A kind of customizing chess language (similar to a programming language) with
>tremendous potential IMO. But it was more for the (very) advanced user;

Yes, very advanced indeed unless you speak Austrian. AFAIK, the documentation is
only available in the Austrian language.

IA

 I didn't
>hear much about it except in the reviews after the release. So I think it's good
>that at least one of these creations appear in a rating list somewhere.
>
>Regards,
>M.Scheidl



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.