Author: Paul Doire
Date: 20:54:03 11/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2001 at 17:37:38, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >>The only sensible thing you can read from the list is the strength of the >>Tigers, which isn't a novelty. The collection of strange settings, different >>hardware and timecontrol makes the list worthless. Unless you want a good laugh >>and who doesn't? So yet another fun rating list. > > >there is no need that you like the list. > >but there is also no need to disqualify the list as a joke. > >1.there are no strange settings included. most of the special settings are very >good and useful. and no other list shows that. > >2.the different time controls are the goal of the list. so you can see which >program is the best "overall" and not under special laboratory conditions which >no one has at home. > >3.there are also separated lists for blitz,rapid and tournament chess. > >and: if you laugh or not, all the lists have different leaders. but overall >tiger is the best (on single). > >so ignore the list if you dislike it, but stay away from showing disrespect. >it´s not fair to the people which are spending so much time. > >not very gentle, your comment. > >marcus Hi Marcus thanks for your list, I saved your site from last time you posted these results.Unfortunately...you got the same cold response from the "regulars" Please remember half of what these regulars say is disrespectful and a joke... like they say your list is. Only their research and tests are valid...there is a high degree of intolerance to newcomers and occasional posters....I have belonged here for 2 years now and have watched this behavior consistently, and it has disgusted me. Thanks again for your list, any and all info about engine performance interests me.....I gather and draw MY OWN conclusions not the conclusions of the "regulars" Have a great day Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.