Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Autoplay driver not public. Unfair why?

Author: Don Dailey

Date: 08:40:26 06/03/98

Go up one level in this thread


On June 03, 1998 at 00:05:56, Komputer Korner wrote:

>On June 02, 1998 at 18:45:42, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>Could someone explain why Fritz 5, or any other company, is required to
>>make their autoplayer public? I keep reading about a gentelmen's
>>agreement, and vague statements about unfairness. What agreement was
>>made, and who made it?
>
>Ed Schroder has tried to get a gentleman's agreement to have all the
>programmers provide their program's autoplay driver to the public. The
>idea is that if one program has a secret autoplayer then others won't be
>able to test against it while it will be able to test against theirs.
>This is unfair. He probably won't succeed because having a bunch of
>programmers agree on  anything except the alpha beta algorithm is next
>to impossible.
>--
>Komputer Korner


For what it's worth, I support such a development.

- Don



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.