Author: Chessfun
Date: 15:59:01 11/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2001 at 18:09:26, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 21, 2001 at 17:37:38, Marcus Kaestner wrote: > >>there is no need that you like the list. > >Correct. > >>but there is also no need to disqualify the list as a joke. > >Yes, there is. > >>1.there are no strange settings included. most of the special settings are very >>good and useful. and no other list shows that. > >Fortunately most lists avoid to obscure the general picture with explorer, >challenger, y13 and triple brain experiments, so that is certainly true. In >another fun list there was four Fritz versions represented, so I'm also a little >disappointed. And there are certainly room for more "good and useful" >Chessmaster settings. Since this was the second reference to my rating lists me you made in this thread, I'll give you the same answer I gave you already when you posted the same statement in reply to my lightning list. The Fritz versions Old, 6a, 6b and 6c all perform differently. Whether it dissappoints you to see them isn't relevant. If you had ever bothered to test them in any test suite you choose you'd see they are all different. If Chessbase had choose to sell them and call them 7, 8 and 9 then certainly everyone else would also have been testing them. I removed CMFuns results from my own lists as for my own purposes I simply want a list of available programs that don't require modifications. That is the case with all the Fritz versions. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.