Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 16:51:22 11/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2001 at 18:59:01, Chessfun wrote: >Since this was the second reference to my rating lists me you made in this >thread, I'll give you the same answer I gave you already when you posted the >same statement in reply to my lightning list. It was used as an example of how to expand the uselessness of the Chessbits list even more and nothing else. >The Fritz versions Old, 6a, 6b and 6c all perform differently. Whether it >dissappoints you to see them isn't relevant. If you had ever bothered to test >them in any test suite you choose you'd see they are all different. Actually, I was disappointed not to see them in the Chessbits list, since almost everything else imaginable was already present. It had nothing to do with your attempts. As for the various Fritz versions. Whether they perform differently isn't really relevant. There is at most two different Fritz 6 versions and they are Fritz 6 Old and the latest service pack version. The a, b and c separation is an invention. >If Chessbase had choose to sell them and call them 7, 8 and 9 then certainly >everyone else would also have been testing them. Apart from the fact that a few customers would feel terribly cheated, then it's a nonargument because it doesn't correspond with reality. >I removed CMFuns results from my own lists as for my own purposes I simply want >a list of available programs that don't require modifications. That is the case >with all the Fritz versions. Fair enough. Even though it results in an unfair and uninteresting list IMHO. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.