Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 19:02:56 11/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2001 at 20:43:22, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I suppose you missed the point of the discussion? Searching from back to Hmm. >I'm not saying _either_ is better or worse than the other. I'm simply saying >front-to-back is _consistent_ while back-to-front is not. Funny, you said a lot about accuracy in your original post but nothing about consistency. Maybe I missed the point of the discussion when you decided to change it without telling anyone? Re-reading your original post, you seem to believe that neither approach is able to find mistakes, which I think is already supremely wrong. Then you go on to imply that one wronly indicated "mistake" is somehow better than a different, wrongly indicated "mistake," which, I suppose, is where your recently proposed consistency argument comes into play. -Tom
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.