Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:37:34 11/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2001 at 19:25:07, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 22, 2001 at 07:17:40, Uri Blass wrote: > >>>I see that sjeng only found a draw score for Nd5 and did not find the game move >>>for white. >>> >>>If white is winning against Nd5 then the remaining question is how much time >>>does sjeng need to find the win for white after Nd5(in the game white played >>>Rad1 and not Bc1 in reply to Nd5). > >Sjeng: go >Middlegame phase. >Clearing hash... >Time for move : 60000000 > 2 -459 277 1762 Be3 Nxe3 Rxe3 Bd7 > 2 -458 278 2504 Rac1 ! > 2 -429 279 3164 Rad1 ! > 2 -417 283 6925 Rad1 Kxh6 Qh3+ Kg6 Qxh2 Qxh2+ Kxh2 > 3 -417 284 8662 Rad1 Kxh6 Qh3+ Kg6 Qxh2 Qxh2+ Kxh2 > 3 -416 287 11525 Bxd5 ! > 3 -410 291 17017 Re4 ! > 3 -396 295 23192 Re4 Kxh6 Rh4+ Kg7 Bxd5 > 4 -418 300 30396 Re4 Kxh6 Qh3+ Kg7 Rg4+ Kh8 Qxh2 Qxh2+ Kxh2 > 4 -417 303 33208 Bxd5 ! > 4 -415 315 51792 Rad1 ! > 4 -390 347 95976 Bd2 ! > 4 -376 365 119421 Bc1 ! > 4 -366 367 122608 Bc1 !! > 4 -284 372 132186 Bc1 Bf4 Bxd5 Bxc1 Be4+ f5 Raxc1 fxe4 Rxe4 > 4 -284 376 134722 Bc1 Bf4 Bxd5 Bxc1 Be4+ f5 Raxc1 fxe4 Rxe4 > 5 -284 391 157448 Bc1 Bf4 Bxd5 Bxc1 Be4+ f5 Raxc1 [Qxc3] > 5 -283 450 252460 Bxd5 ! > 5 -254 457 266312 Bxd5 !! > 5 -255 462 277805 Bxd5 ?? > 5 -334 505 358132 Bxd5 exd5 Bd2 Bf5 g3 Be4 Rxe4 dxe4 Qxe4+ > 5 -284 521 401894 Bc1 ! > 5 -284 521 401896 Bc1 <Bf4> <Bxd5> <Bxc1> <Be4+> <f5> <Raxc1> [Qxc3] > 6 -254 552 455228 Bc1 !! > 6 -248 577 505723 Bc1 Bf4 Qg4+ Kh6 Bxd5 Bxc1 Qh4+ Kg7 Bxb7 > 6 -247 597 546081 Bxd5 ! > 6 -245 867 1035505 Bxd5 Rxd5 Be3 h5 g3 Rf5 Qg2 h4 Qxh2 hxg3 fxg3 > 7 -215 949 1187608 Bxd5 !! > 7 -216 1093 1452428 Bxd5 ?? > 7 -243 1697 2484938 Bxd5 Rxd5 Be3 h5 g3 Rf5 Qg2 h4 Bf4 > 7 -242 2330 3574075 Re4 ! > 7 -232 2625 4241498 Re4 Kxh6 Bxd5 Kg7 Rg4+ Kf8 Be4 Be5 Rg1 Ke8 Bxh7 > 8 -258 3516 5720790 Re4 Kxh6 Bxd5 Qe7 Qh3+ Kg7 Rh4 Qf6 Rxh7+ Kg8 Qxh2 >Rxd5 > 8 -257 3638 5971447 Bxd5 ! > 8 -202 3713 6158531 Bxd5 !! > 8 -203 4528 7728129 Bxd5 ?? > 8 -203 6904 11682734 Bxd5 Rxd5 Bc1 Bd6 Qg4+ Kf6 c4 Rc5 Bh6 Ke7 Re4 > 8 -203 6904 11682777 Bxd5 Rxd5 Bc1 Bd6 Qg4+ Kf6 c4 Rc5 Bh6 Ke7 Re4 > 9 -233 7634 12842083 Bxd5 ?? > 9 -232 13126 21377126 Rad1 ! > 9 -173 16931 27655130 Rad1 !! > 9 -173 18397 30055008 Rad1 f5 Qh3 Bf4 Bxf4 Qxf4 c4 Qxf2 cxd5 exd5 Re7 > 9 -173 22521 36839649 Rad1 f5 Qh3 Bf4 Bxf4 Qxf4 c4 Qxf2 cxd5 exd5 Re7 >10 -151 29328 49130161 Rad1 f5 Qh3 Bf4 Bxf4 Qxf4 c4 Qxf2 cxd5 exd5 Qd3 Qh4+ >Kg1 >10 -151 50618 85235629 Rad1 f5 Qh3 Bf4 Bxf4 Qxf4 c4 Qxf2 cxd5 exd5 Qd3 Qh4+ >Kg1 >11 -149 65336 111220034 Rad1 f5 Qh3 Bf4 Bxf4 Qxf4 c4 Qxf2 cxd5 exd5 Qd3 b6 >Bxd5 Qxb2 >11 -148 85131 146047849 Bc1 ! >11 -121 87818 151767050 Bc1 !! >11 0 116457 204130006 Bc1 f5 g3 Bxg3 Rg1 Nf6 Rxg3+ Ng4 Rxg4+ fxg4 Qxg4+ >Kf7 Qh5+ Kg7 Qg5+ Kh8 Qf6 + Kg8 Qg5+ Kh8 <Qf6+> >11 0 125711 218178396 Bc1 f5 g3 Bxg3 Rg1 Nf6 Rxg3+ Ng4 Rxg4+ fxg4 Qxg4+ >Kf7 Qh5+ Kg7 Qg5+ Kh8 Qf6 + Kg8 Qg5+ Kh8 >12 -30 138468 240381285 Bc1 ?? >12 -37 264485 460111883 Bc1 Bf4 Bxd5 Bxc1 Be4+ f5 Raxc1 fxe4 Qg4+ Kf7 Rxe4 >Rg8 Rf4+ Ke7 Qh4+ Ke8 Rd 1 >12 -37 306381 529082633 Bc1 Bf4 Bxd5 Bxc1 Be4+ f5 Raxc1 fxe4 Qg4+ Kf7 Rxe4 >Rg8 Rf4+ Ke7 Qh4+ Ke8 Rd 1 >13 -67 332504 573746702 Bc1 ?? >13 -66 660694 1157218145 Rad1 ! >13 -56 1102673 1914768481 Rad1 f5 Qh3 Bf4 g4 fxg4 Bc2+ Kf7 Qh5+ Ke7 Qh4+ >Ke8 Qh5+ Qf7 Qxf7+ Kxf7 Bx f4 Kg8 c4 Rf8 >14 -47 1744070 -1224056809 Rad1 f5 Bxd5 Rxd5 Rxd5 exd5 Qe3 Qd8 g3 d4 cxd4 >Bxg3 fxg3 Qd5+ Kg1 f4 Qxf 4 Bh3 Re7 Qxa2 Rxb7 >14 -46 2478800 63960834 Bc1 ! >14 -26 2554864 208591317 Bc1 !! > >-- >GCP Gambittiger does not agree and say Rad1 is best New position [D]r1br4/1pq2p1p/p3p1kB/3n4/8/1BP2Q2/PP3PPb/R3R2K w - - 0 1 Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0: 2.Qh3 Bf4 3.Bc2+ f5 4.Bxf4 Qxf4 5.Kg1 = (-0.06) Depth: 7 00:00:00 96kN 2.g3 Kxh6 3.c4 Ne7 4.Qf6+ Ng6 5.Kxh2 = (-0.08) Depth: 7 00:00:00 145kN 2.g3 Kxh6 3.Bxd5 Rxd5 4.Qf6+ Kh5 5.g4+ Kxg4 6.Rg1+ Bxg1 7.Rxg1+ Kh5 8.Qf3+ Kh6 ³ (-0.31) Depth: 8 00:00:00 205kN 2.Bc1 Bf4 3.Bxd5 Bxc1 4.Be4+ f5 5.Raxc1 fxe4 6.Rxe4 = (0.00) Depth: 8 00:00:02 525kN 2.Bc1 Bf4 3.Bxd5 Bxc1 4.Be4+ f5 5.Raxc1 fxe4 6.Rxe4 = (0.00) Depth: 9 00:00:02 616kN 2.Bc1 Bf4 3.Bxd5 Bxc1 4.Be4+ f5 5.Raxc1 fxe4 6.Rxe4 Kg7 7.Rg4+ Kh8 µ (-0.76) Depth: 10 00:00:05 1325kN 2.g3 Kxh6 3.Bxd5 Kg7 4.Be4 f5 5.Bc2 Rd2 6.Rac1 Rxc2 7.Rxc2 ² (0.46) Depth: 10 00:00:08 1902kN 2.g3 Kxh6 3.Bxd5 Kg7 4.Be4 f5 5.Bd3 Bxg3 6.fxg3 Qc6 7.Qxc6 bxc6 8.Rad1 ² (0.30) Depth: 11 00:00:16 3864kN 2.Bc1 Kg7 3.g3 Bxg3 4.Rg1 Kh8 5.Rxg3 Rg8 6.Bh6 Rxg3 7.fxg3 ± (1.02) Depth: 11 00:00:30 7027kN 2.Bc1 = (0.12) Depth: 12 00:01:50 26933kN 2.Bc1 Bf4 3.Bxd5 Bxc1 4.Be4+ f5 5.Raxc1 fxe4 6.Rxe4 e5 7.Rh4 Kg7 8.Qh5 Qe7 9.Qxh7+ Kf8 = (0.10) Depth: 13 00:02:00 29329kN 2.Bc1 Bf4 3.Bxd5 Bxc1 4.Be4+ f5 5.Raxc1 fxe4 6.Rxe4 e5 7.Rh4 Kg7 8.Qh5 Qe7 9.Qxh7+ Kf8 10.Qh5 = (0.04) Depth: 14 00:05:27 81847kN 2.Bc1 Bf4 3.Bxd5 Bxc1 4.Be4+ f5 5.Raxc1 fxe4 6.Rxe4 e5 7.Rce1 Qc6 8.Qg3+ Kf7 9.Rh4 Qe6 10.Rxh7+ Kf8 ³ (-0.30) Depth: 15 00:17:22 265554kN 2.g3 Kxh6 3.Bxd5 Kg7 4.Be4 f5 5.Bd3 Qc6 6.Qxc6 bxc6 7.Rad1 Rb8 8.b3 Bxg3 9.fxg3 = (0.14) Depth: 15 00:22:59 349603kN 2.Rad1 Be5 3.Qh3 Bg7 4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Qg4+ Kf8 6.Qd4 f6 7.c4 e5 8.Qd2 Bg4 9.Qh6+ Qg7 10.Qxg7+ Kxg7 ² (0.32) Depth: 15 00:51:18 799166kN 2.Rad1 Be5 3.Qh3 Bf4 4.Bxf4 Qxf4 5.c4 Kg7 6.Kg1 b5 7.cxd5 exd5 8.Qe3 Qxe3 9.Rxe3 Be6 10.Rde1 ² (0.34) Depth: 16 01:12:10 1130369kN 2.Rad1 Be5 3.Bc1 f6 4.Qg4+ Kf7 5.f4 Bd6 6.Rxd5 Rg8 7.Qh5+ Kg7 8.Rdd1 Bd7 9.Bc2 f5 10.Be3 Bc6 11.Bd4+ ± (0.86) Depth: 17 04:27:16 4276578kN 2.Rad1 Be5 3.Bc1 f6 4.Qg4+ Kf7 5.f4 Nxf4 6.Rxd8 Qxd8 7.Bxf4 Bxf4 8.Qxf4 Qe7 9.Qf5 Ke8 10.Bxe6 Bxe6 ± (1.00) Depth: 18 11:44:47 11440947kN (Blass, Tel-aviv 25.11.2001) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.