Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz 6 old,yt,a,b,c...

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 02:07:52 11/25/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 24, 2001 at 21:48:16, Mike S. wrote:

>I wouldn't use more than one version (within the same major version number) at
>the same time... but it makes sense to keep the results separated IMO, for that
>differences are visible.

Yes, I agree.

>Currently it looks like 7 and 7a are quite different... let's see if it will be
>considered serving the usefullness if their results are combined somewhere on a
>rating list, i.e. SSDF. I don't hope so (but I certainly won't call it
>"expanding the uselessness" if it happens :o). I'd call it loss of information.

The problem with selecting an arbitrary number of versions for some engines is
that it will skew the list. Some engines will suffer and others benefit from
four Fritz 6 and two Fritz 7 versions as an example. The same would happen if
all Crafty versions were represented. It may add information from a neutral
point of view, but it also deducts information at the same time or obscures it
to be precise.

Regards,
Mogens



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.