Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Intelligent answers please!!

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 12:45:53 11/25/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 2001 at 13:58:13, Victor Fernandez wrote:

>On November 25, 2001 at 13:26:48, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>As I am the programmer of Tiger I think I can answer you.
>>
>>I spend all my time improving the intelligence of Tiger's evaluation and search
>>algorithms, and I think in this regard my program has progressed a lot in the
>>last years.
>>
>>As have almost all the other commercial and amateur chess programs.
>>
>>You have obviously absolutely no idea about the progress of chess programs.
>>Actually you seem to know almost nothing about chess programs.
>>
>>Your comparison between the performance of WChess and Tiger and the conclusions
>>you draw from this are simply irrelevant.
>>
>>You either do not know what you are talking about, or you just want to troll.
>>
>>Get real.
>
>Dear Christophe,
>
>My comparison between Wchess and Tiger has been evidently unfortunate, and my
>intention has not been to offend him.  I don't question their effort and work
>in the development of their program, I only wanted to stand out that the work
>of the programmers he seems to go more to the competition front other
>programs that to the development front the human players.
>
>Sorry,
>
>Affectionately,
>
>Victor Fernandez

I totally disagree

1)I think that you use one tournament that was not tournament time control to
learn about wchess level against humans and it is wrong.


I think that you do not consider the fact that humans know today to play better
against chess programs.

I believe that programmers who do their programs clearly better in comp-comp
games usually do them better also in comp-humans games.

It may be common that one program is slightly better against humans when the
other program is slightly better against computers but cases when one program is
clearly better(more than 100 elo difference) against computers and not better
against humans are rare.

A possible reason for  exceptions is if one program is too known by humans so
humans know it's weaknesses better and this is the reason that I am not going to
be surprised if Fritz is weaker against humans.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.