Author: Victor Fernandez
Date: 13:12:48 11/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2001 at 15:45:53, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 25, 2001 at 13:58:13, Victor Fernandez wrote: > >I totally disagree > >1)I think that you use one tournament that was not tournament time control to >learn about wchess level against humans and it is wrong. > > >I think that you do not consider the fact that humans know today to play better >against chess programs. > >I believe that programmers who do their programs clearly better in comp-comp >games usually do them better also in comp-humans games. > >It may be common that one program is slightly better against humans when the >other program is slightly better against computers but cases when one program is >clearly better(more than 100 elo difference) against computers and not better >against humans are rare. > >A possible reason for exceptions is if one program is too known by humans so >humans know it's weaknesses better and this is the reason that I am not going to >be surprised if Fritz is weaker against humans. > >Uri Hi Uri ! I don't share their opinion, Of all it is known that from the dedicated micros, some (NOVAG) they played better generally against the humans that others (MEPHISTO). The form of programming an engine to win a game, it is completely different if he will face against a human player, or against a engine. Another thing is that only be programmed chess, but this is something different. Victor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.