Author: Mike S.
Date: 15:48:11 11/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2001 at 18:20:34, Sune Fischer wrote: >On November 25, 2001 at 12:27:10, Victor Fernandez wrote: > >>(...) the chessprograms have that to begin to break the >>"horizon effect", using "chunks", planning to long term and to use >>algorithms to examine only 1 or 2 positions in each move discarding >>the other ones very faster, in another case will never end up playing >>chess well. >(...) >If you expect chess programmers to develop AI you are expecting a lot. Saying "AI" is like opening Pandora's box at a computer chess message board. We're doomed! :o) But for whatever reason opinions are presented - and I think we shouldn't be too suspicous - which we think are wrong (outdated information, incomplete facts, or even trolling): The challenge is, if people here can provide better facts and arguments or explain different views in a convincing way. After all, if you imagine people who are not as much, or not at all "into" computer chess like we are, then the comparison above with Wchess' performance 1994 and Tiger's 2001 sounds perfectly logical, if people don't know any more details. Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.