Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 15:56:57 11/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2001 at 18:48:11, Mike S. wrote: >>(...) >>If you expect chess programmers to develop AI you are expecting a lot. > >Saying "AI" is like opening Pandora's box at a computer chess message board. >We're doomed! :o) lol, yeah but he sort of hinted at something like that, didn't he :) >But for whatever reason opinions are presented - and I think we shouldn't be too >suspicous - which we think are wrong (outdated information, incomplete facts, or >even trolling): The challenge is, if people here can provide better facts and >arguments or explain different views in a convincing way. yes, I hope I didn't come off to strong, I was really just trying to explain that chess is hard!! >After all, if you imagine people who are not as much, or not at all "into" >computer chess like we are, then the comparison above with Wchess' performance >1994 and Tiger's 2001 sounds perfectly logical, if people don't know any more >details. Tell me about it, one year ago I too thought that programming an engine would be easy (once I had the move generator). Was I ever wrong! I take my hat off to all the hardcore dudes in this forum. >Regards, >M.Scheidl -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.