Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 10:26:56 11/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 26, 2001 at 12:43:55, Dann Corbit wrote: >On November 26, 2001 at 12:40:30, Benny Antonsson wrote: > >>On November 26, 2001 at 11:47:41, Sally Weltrop wrote: >> >>>On November 26, 2001 at 11:36:19, Bas Hamstra wrote: >>> >>>>I thought it was only an old program, no longer under development. But no, it is >>>>alive and kicking, playing at FICS currently, operated by D. Kittinger himself. >>>>And at only a lowly PIII-300 it plays very nice attacking chess. Strong program! >>>>Anybody knows if it still uses singular extensions? >>> >>>what's the handle over there on FIC of WChess? >> >>The handle is: WChessX >> >>Statistics for WChessX(C) On for: 14 hrs, 29 mins Idle: 4 hrs, 8 mins >> >> rating RD win loss draw total best >>Blitz 2329 38.7 169 171 85 425 2442 (11-Aug-2001) >>Standard 2314 59.2 20 24 14 58 2320 (22-Nov-2001) >>Lightning 2442 85.0 12 16 10 38 >>Wild ---- 350.0 0 0 0 0 >>Bughouse ---- 350.0 0 0 0 0 >>Crazyhouse ---- 350.0 0 0 0 0 >>Suicide ---- 350.0 0 0 0 0 >> >> >>Timeseal : On >> >> 1: WChessX running on 300mhz AMD K6 >> 2: Operator is author Dave Kittinger >> 3: Generally unattended >> 4: Has draw accept/reject logic, but not real easy to achieve. >> 5: Large learned opening book. >> 6: 3 and 4 piece endgames > >It is clear that he has been improving the program, then. Tablebase files are a >new development (comparatively speaking). What is the current Gambit Tiger Chess rating at FICS, and what would Wchess rating be if Mr Kittinger would be using an Athlon 1.4 MHz instead.?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.