Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GMs don't piss in their pants anymore

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 11:42:07 11/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 2001 at 17:01:25, Matthias Gemuh wrote:

>
>7 years ago, any GM trembled in from of any weak program (see performance of
>WChess). Now programs are MUCH stronger, but any GM is now equipped with strong
>anti-computer techniques. GMs don't piss so much anymore in their pants when
>they confront silicon monsters.
>
>Regards,
>Matthias.

Ok I will take you out of your dream GM's cant win from the top programs on a
300mhz computer.
The only reason why they could give some presure against them
Only is because of this reason
Program program games are posted on SSDF
Many anelyzes where made by me
The only thing they had to do is rembering the lost games of the engine
or my anelyzes
without this knowledge they would not have a chance

Actualy the samething hapened with Fischer at his jonger times
He alway did use the same opening after wich his oponents where fuly prepared to
meet these openings.
Fischer then did start to play more openings
And for instance played 1.b4 instead of 1.e4
which can be called a psycholgical move.
Imagine Kasparov would play 1.g4 and you would be his oponent.
You aint gona laugh then.

Though programs many times do not choose the precise corect folow ups of moves
Most of the time the programs will out calculate a GM
on tactical bases.
The strength of a human is positional inside
espacialy seeing an endgames on an early bases
and usage of pawns during the game
and knowledge about strong fields and how to use them
And not just giving these points up for small material gaining in an unclear
position.
Junior 7 is doing this actualy when it can create Kasparov's octopus (A knight
on d3 or d6)
So actualy having the knowledge of what positions are clear or unclear.
But don't read the books where a gm is ending with (A) has a clear plus
It also could change your way to saying what is clear or unclear
Loosing 1 of the benifits on  the humanside.
Regards Marc van Hal



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.