Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 02:10:57 11/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 26, 2001 at 18:09:04, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On November 25, 2001 at 10:45:14, Victor Fernandez wrote: > >>1994 >> >>WChess (Pentium 90 !) makes a 2895 !!! performance rating >>against Grandmasters at Fifth Harvard Cup. > >This shows how many customers only kick on one result against GMs >what you do against computers it all doesn't matter. customers >want to hear whatever. > >>2001 >>Chess Tiger 14 866 Mhz, 256 Mb RAM, performance rating >>2788 at Republica Argentina. (It is only an example ) > >>7 years of difference in development of algorithms, and a >>increase of 776 Mhz they are translated in -107 Elo ?. > >>What Elo would obtain against GM's any current Top chessprogram >>in a P90 with 64 Mb RAM ?. > >the programs get annihilated because GMs are now used to play 1+ Ghz >machines. If they face something 40 times slower then, then they >are going to rock. So the GMs kick the software silly. In a recent event Deep Fritz wasn't kicked silly ,if I remember well, against a famous GM...and if I'm correct also in Argentina were present few GMs and IMs. however >you can't afford strong GMs so you get some 'weak' gms. these guys >are playing real scared already against a guy called Diepeveen (FM) 2312. > >So in short if they already play like scared pigs against me (and >allowing me sometimes because of this to escape to draw against them) >then how you think they do tactical against the computer? > >Right. some games they will lose because of tactical shots! > >It's easy to get close to 50% with a program against a 2500 GM. > >It's impossible to beat him though. > >A good example of a top program at slow hardware (133Mhz or something) >is pocket shredder. sold under fritz. How much chance you give >pocket fritz at a MIPS 133Mhz against me at 40 in 2 level? > >I give it 0% chance to win a match. > > >>My question is , when they will stop to cut code the programmers >>(with honorable exceptions) and to begin to develop programs a >>bit intelligent, or we will have to wait to have at home hardware >>with 256 processors and 10 TB RAM to be able to see to play chess ?. >> >>Thanks, >> >>An customer
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.