Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 02:45:21 11/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2001 at 05:33:33, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 27, 2001 at 05:10:57, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On November 26, 2001 at 18:09:04, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On November 25, 2001 at 10:45:14, Victor Fernandez wrote: >>> >>>>1994 >>>> >>>>WChess (Pentium 90 !) makes a 2895 !!! performance rating >>>>against Grandmasters at Fifth Harvard Cup. >>> >>>This shows how many customers only kick on one result against GMs >>>what you do against computers it all doesn't matter. customers >>>want to hear whatever. >>> >>>>2001 >>>>Chess Tiger 14 866 Mhz, 256 Mb RAM, performance rating >>>>2788 at Republica Argentina. (It is only an example ) >>> >>>>7 years of difference in development of algorithms, and a >>>>increase of 776 Mhz they are translated in -107 Elo ?. >>> >>>>What Elo would obtain against GM's any current Top chessprogram >>>>in a P90 with 64 Mb RAM ?. >>> >>>the programs get annihilated because GMs are now used to play 1+ Ghz >>>machines. If they face something 40 times slower then, then they >>>are going to rock. So the GMs kick the software silly. >> >>In a recent event Deep Fritz wasn't kicked silly ,if I remember well, against a >>famous GM...and if I'm correct also in Argentina were present few GMs and IMs. > >The GM's also did not play against p90. > >Uri You are right, I misinterpreted the 40 times slower factor I suppose. Regards.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.